affected by the epidemic, domestic car sales declined substantially, falling nearly 20-year high. At the same time, due to the outbreak overseas, resulting in a number of overseas factories and vehicle parts plant shutdowns, involving nearly 20 brands and hundreds of factories. Even today, the country is in an orderly return to work them, but the market is still deserted, and ready to face the overseas production downtime secondary impact on the country. And the sales market is relatively deserted, was recently released vehicle recall information, even it is no exaggeration to say that the number of cars in the recall of almost domestic passenger car sales in February fairly.
March 27, the State Administration of market Defective Product Management Center released a 7 recall information, the recall involves eight brands, a total of 2,526,720,000 vehicles, mainly due to the recall of a flaw in the system of five parts. Note that, in the recall of the brand, there are seven luxury brands.
in the recall, the main reasons for the recall system focused on the following five components, namely, before the bridge control arm, airbags, steering, brake light, ASDM software. Incidentally, the first four parts of the system is a hardware problem, because only Volvo recall of a software problem that ASDM this active safety control module.
compared to four hardware, perhaps we are more familiar with this active safety of the ASDM main control module. But in fact, this is one of the components of the current vehicle active safety systems indispensable. The Volvo recall involves model range of domestic and imported Volvo XC60, XC40, S60, S90, V60, V90 Cross Country, XC90, a total of 150,929, accounting for the total number of issued a recall of 6 percent. The reason for the recall is also very simple, is due to the supplier’s recall vehicles ASDM software may not be introduced in the fourth week since 2019 ASDM hardware is fully compatible.
It is reported that once the ASDM software and hardware is not compatible, or AEB will likely lead to a collision warning information, brake assist function is impaired, but conventional braking of the vehicle function is not affected. And according to reports, the recall was voluntary recall of Volvo, for recalled vehicles, Volvo will be a free upgrade ASDM software solutions.
It is worth mentioning that, in addition to Volvo since the late introduction of the new the ASDM hardware, software and hardware may not match the lead and recall, the rest seven brand recall, mostly due to design defects or substandard workmanship standards and other reasons, which include Bentley is adding more models in this class. In recent years, body mass luxury brand models is increasing, questioned on quality and design are also rising. And so far from last year, the luxury brand models frequently recall, it is the Internet different opinions.
In fact, in recent years there have been calls for a rational view of the recalled sound, but still there are many people recall this very thing and the word “sensitive”, but even “recall” and “not quality” hooks. But it certainly is the view of one kind of biased, because in the domestic and foreign recall recall a certain difference.
car recall first appeared in the United States, while the United States is now the world’s “recall” one of the strongest countries. In the US, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, NHTSA’s vehicle safety as the highest authority, not only for new cars collision detection and star rating, but also on highway accidents statistics, early warning and consumption according to traffic accidents for cars defects investigation, and even issued a mandatory recall commands to the car manufacturers.
In contrast, the defect responsible for domestic productionProduct identification and recall regulation AQSIQ, the lack of an authoritative professional quality of that new car means, instead of using the “expert database” approach. Although this method is more flexible, but also more subjective, not as good as real data strongly, so in many cases, to give room for “bargain” in car prices. Among such active and passive relationship, in fact, the test of conscience and national brand of supervision on two levels.
Take for example the recall, involving eight brands are mostly spontaneous recall. In other words these vehicle safety problems arise not relevant state departments detected, but each found their own brand, and follow conscience and initiated the recall. In these recall among more things done National regulatory authorities are accepting applications, and issued a recall. In this context, you really hard to conclude that every recall exactly who is responsible.
Perhaps some people may think, since every car in the factory before the manufacturers have received so-called adaptive test, and that responsibility should be borne by the manufacturers, so as to put an end to recall fundamentally. But in fact, even if the vehicle manufacturers have been adaptive training, but there are differences artificially set of environmental testing will always be the real car. And under the new trend of the four modernizations, automotive technology becomes more complex, we want to completely achieve 0 errors impossible.
to the recall, for example, these five components for the motor vehicle is quite important, but in fact, the question is not stupid mistake, because as the Audi Q7 recall, is the actual weld strength and may not match the technical specifications and not necessarily a problem occurs. In contrast, a similar recall shows more sense of responsibility for a car company, and for any possible errors have the courage to admit, the courage to take.
Moreover, we as consumers, when faced with auto defects should play a watchdog role, but at the same time ,weIt should also actively cooperate with manufacturers to recall the vehicle, when a collaborator rather than a “cynical.” Conversely, consumers are more positive with, but also allows the brand manufacturers do not fear the recall will affect the reputation of the brand, and can not recall, this is actually a mutual win situation. Since the error rate requires brands to do compared to 0, I believe that only when working together for brand manufacturers assume that consumers actively cooperate with relevant departments to strengthen supervision, the quality of the car is the best way to eliminate hidden dangers.
(Source network, intrusion deleted)