commander PHEV seems a little “silent” on the market. At least, the car’s attention, than the original Tang DM like the car is a lot worse. For mainstream consumers, this seems to be a policy of catering to the product, more than 300,000 yuan starting price also makes people feel as if “nothing with their relationship.”
read the article card t, t heard card program people should know, tert-card for commanders and there is nothing too positive comments. In fact, after the listing of its sales performance is lackluster. However, for the commander PHEV, tert-card but want a change of perspective: this really can!
■ Price: 30,000 less expensive than oil, the price difference also can
starting at 309,800 yuan commander PHEV expensive? Do not expensive?
In fact, comparison and know. Note that this is the commander PHEV, it is 5, so only with the Commander (Commander rather large) fuel ratio version.
must first clear, commander PHEV version of the fuel corresponding to the power level should be 265 horsepower version, rather than the 234 hp version. The reason is simple: While PHEV version of the engine is a low-power version, but the two-motor system PHEV superposition, its overall power is 260 horsepower. Coupled with the low speed and high torque characteristics of the motor (motor torque 432 Nm), power in most cases it can fully compete with the high-power fuel version of the 2.0T, some conditions and even stronger.
and then compare prices, you will find fuel PHEV version than the version, you probably will not see 30000 (30.98-28.18 = 28000 yuan, the configuration is roughly equal). Of course, this is only guidance. How much difference to the future terminal will be remains to be seen.
what this level it spread? Roughly equivalent to the price difference between hybrid and fuel version of Toyota (Camry). Remember, however, has a PHEV commander 13 kWh battery life can be purely electrical plug 70 km hybrid models.
Although we can not simply use the difference between the Don and Don Fuel DM version analogy, nor can the dual-engine E + Corolla and Corolla Fuel version of the difference between analogy, but at least use these models as a reference, it should be We can draw a conclusion: if the commander fuel version of the price is not artificially high, then the commander of the PHEV price really “can also be” the.
■ technology: no transmission PHEV, which is really a plug-in hybrid version
It has long been hybrid technology for Chrysler, Fiat and even JEEP are “heard” . In other words, FCA in the hybrid field, is not known, in theory, is not good.
then for the commander of this hybrid PHEV will take for granted that it is in the traditional fuel version of the model based on the simple addition of PHEV motor and battery. Tert card called “oil hybrid.” Technology like this is very common, very common, even in many luxury car Volvo, Land Rover and so on. Including BYD’s DM.
Such techniques are big grooves point, i.e., electrical power, oil is oil, there is no real “mixed” with each other. Direct the performance, higher fuel consumption conditions without electricity, integrated mileage is not very long. Even as third generation BYD DM, although improved, but that the Toyota hybrid is still a gap.
t said card, the distinction between “true hybrid” and “oil hybrid” The most obvious signs: there is no conventional fuel vehicle transmission. There, they belong to “the oil hybrid” did not belong on the big probability “true hybrid.”
PHEV commander no conventional multi-gear transmission. It is this assembly structure and principle, and Toyota’s THS II, a common hybrid is similar. That is, from a combustion engine, the two-motor and the planetary gear set components. The planetary gear set is a mechanism for the hybrid services. By double servo motor, electrical mixed with oil flooding flooding, as far as possible in order to allow the engine to work only in the best conditions, to achieve the objective of saving.
In contrast, the system and the commander PHEV closer versatile system, i.e. it is synergistic two motors more active, can more combination patterns. For example, in pure electric modeThe double motor can be driven, in order to improve the performance of electric-power mode, and the like.
t course also pointed out the card, the structure is on the one hand, the other hand is the ultimate performance. Another key decision is the final performance of the control system algorithm, there is also a barrier. Why Toyota’s THS II Niuhong, excellent algorithm actually go beyond the barrier structure (especially patent opening today). How practical effect
Commander of the PHEV in the end, has yet to be given more feedback after the owner of the actual experience. If you look at official data, by pure electric mileage of 70 km, 100 km combined fuel consumption of 1.6L can be calculated down, its combined fuel consumption under the state without electricity 6.08L– Toyota’s THS II is not so magical, but for such a 2.1 t the large SUV, can be considered quite good. For reference, the DM data Don Daosuan a result 7.63L, Volvo XC60 interpolation results Daosuan mix is 6.9L.
Of course, then again, these are just the “official data.” In the end is not really any conditions, especially in congested urban conditions without electricity consumption is still low, which has yet to be owners of more samples to test. But at least, the commander PHEV plug mix in terms of structure or technical data, are good.
then this is not a car you can go to the extent of ‘buy buy buy’ it? This is precisely the last card t want to say. Here say no hurry shots, not because you want other concessions, but because the car is on the one hand concern, but on the other hand there is a need to observe.
reason for concern is that all of its structure, and the data that have been given are very pretty – at least looks beautiful. These technologies correspond to the price it gives, if there is fuel version of the same discount rate, in fact, it is very attractive. In the five large SUV’s, at least for now still only a child.
However as mentioned, all the articles are based on analysis of observation and data structure, good in the end just not enough. Coupled with FCA are “novices” in the field of hybrid. Although we can not conclude that its hybrid technology will certainly immature, but toFewer still need to observe carefully.
As PHEV can work normally does not burn oil, the car can save money, long distances do not worry about battery life, battery life can be integrated into the 900 km common-sense stuff, we know everything, do not start to say .
Finally, talk about the card t feel a little sorry place. For a PHEV at the expense of the third row, or a little pity. If you have version seven, I believe will be more attractive. Another is to provide only two drives. If you can add in the price of motor shaft, another strong performance a little, and there will be some people estimate fond of, is not it?
