In recent years, significant progress from the main brand cars, people recognition of domestic cars have gradually improved, eyes are no longer limited to car joint venture vehicle. For consumers with lower prices and better value for money to buy products is the big and good, but there are ten fingers the length, even if there is tier-one brands, various quality also vary, and that the manufacturers of the gap between the car direction affect us? Here’s Chery, Chang’an, BYD, Roewe example, to see who’s better quality.
TOP1: Chery Automobile
China’s independent brand Chery Automobile as “Big Brother” technology accumulation compared with a later car prices obvious advantages, coupled with Chery senior leaders are mostly “engineering”, who believe that it is imperative repairer Big Three of technology in their own hands, this is not like concept cars Honda? Therefore, in such a business environment, Chery core technology gradually walk in front of its own brand, if a single carry technical comparison, then, can the Great Wall, Chery, Geely and many other car brands “hanging up the hammer.”
but good technology Chery for sale can be described as illiterate, for example: everyone for Chang’s “Blue Whale” Roewe “blue core” engine is too familiar, but mention Chery ACTECO series engine, for consumers seems to be a strange name, subconsciously think its quality as good as the first two. The contrary, the main indicators Chery ACTECO series engine, the engine power, fuel consumption, emissions have reached world-class level.
In recent years, Chery many seemingly hang of it, its model of “straight man” much less design, the new Tiggo 8 finally in the interior keep up with trends, monthly sales have stabilized at about 10,000 units and, also launched its high-end brand of stardom, completely dominated by an international design team, to really Chery technology and design phaseCombined market feedback is also quite good.
TOP2: Roewe
Roewe car, formerly known as the British Rover, although inherited the British Rover brand, but Roewe did not inherit with the use of MG Rover technology.
Roewe demonstrated superiority there is a “good father” because SAIC has GM and Volkswagen two joint brand Roewe escort, so in repairer knowledge can be cited for reference. And SAIC large fortune, to the joint venture SAIC Volkswagen brand will be able to earn a lot of money to it, not to mention its Wuling Po Chun and other commercial areas. So in terms of capital, Roewe is nothing to worry about, so that the mechanical technological level of their production line is relatively high in many parts of sheet metal, paint coating, assembly and other details can be reflected.
and in the automotive Big Three, the most majestic rely joint venture brands, is currently a large area equipped with “blue core” engine on its models, SAIC and GM to jointly develop together, can both fuel economy and dynamic performance, quality and reputation are quite good, such as in a car’s models i5 PPH (several hundred cars fault) list, the value is only 59, compared to the next, the same level of competitive products and domestic automobile joint venture has a lot remained at around 200, we can see i5 and mechanical performance of the Big Three levels of workmanship is good.
TOP3: BYD
filed BYD, we do not think it’s an oil tanker, but think it’s an electric car. The early years in the field of car fuel, because of lack of technology, I have not tasted the sweetness of BYD, but also because of quality problems frequently tortured, user reputation plummeted, recovers sight. But the good news BYD good luck, with the leaders of the far-sighted vision, BYD count in the new field of energy in the leader level, compared with the United States even if the Tesla electric car giant, not much better.
excellent performance in the field of new energy fuel vehicles driven by accelerating recovery, after the transformation and upgrading of BYD, launched a new “Dynasty” series models, Take the hottest selling Song For instance, in cars mass chart, PPH value of the vehicle 81, the same level as the opponent of GM6, but the value of PPH 114, there is a big gap between them.
TOP4: Chang
Chang’an Automobile has very high visibility in the domestic brands, with its CS and Yat dynamic series, a major breakthrough in terms of volume, attracting many young consumers. A product people choose, that its quality must be guaranteed, Chang’an CS75 series made in the value of 123 PPH value list, although several of these car prices compare the quality of the gap slightly, but considering that this is ” immortals fight, “better than some, worse than, extended to the entire autonomous vehicle brands, Changan’s performance is still belong to the first group.
As a veteran repairer Changan Automobile company, after years of accumulated technology , and have formed their own automotive quality management mode, and with the gradual changes in consumer attitudes, consumers began to require safety, driving quality, the Chang’an for market research, but also to meet the needs of quality assurance, in terms of vehicle safety , engine configuration and the assembly process will be carried out strictly, and have a complete vehicle testing program, prior to each car on the market, will go through hundreds of stringent testing, will meet with consumers.
Overall, the above-mentioned four independent brand in terms of quality has its own excellent performance, they all have one thing in common, that is, most of the core technologies are in their own hands, and not only to them, more and more car companies realized that long relied on third-party vendors, then check the vehicle for the Big Three quality is difficult to implement, so the development of the core technology is particularly important. I believe that with the passage of time, iterative technology upgrades, “ruggedDurable “label not only in the joint venture vehicle body, can also be found in the independent models.